//farseerfc.me/jp/2011-03-14T20:34:00+09:002011-03-14T20:34:00+09:002011-03-14T20:34:00+09:00farseerfctag:farseerfc.me,2011-03-14:/jp/if-we-do-this-work.html

<p><a class="reference external" href="http://blog.renren.com/blog/230263946/716517729">renren</a> から導入した。</p> <p>From: Bill Gates</p> <p>’-- Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:41 AM</p> <p>Jeff Westorinon; Ben Fathi ;</p> <p>TO: Carl Stork (Exchange); Nathan Myhrvofd; Eric Rudder</p> <p>Subject: ACPI extensions</p> <p>One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific.</p> <p>It …</p>

<p><a class="reference external" href="http://blog.renren.com/blog/230263946/716517729">renren</a> から導入した。</p> <p>From: Bill Gates</p> <p>’-- Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:41 AM</p> <p>Jeff Westorinon; Ben Fathi ;</p> <p>TO: Carl Stork (Exchange); Nathan Myhrvofd; Eric Rudder</p> <p>Subject: ACPI extensions</p> <p>One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific.</p> <p>It seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the work and the result is that <strong>Linux works great without having to do the work</strong>.</p> <p><strong>Maybe there is no way to avoid this problem but it does bother me.</strong></p> <p>Maybe we could define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others even if they are open.</p> <p>Or maybe we could patent something relaled to this.</p> <p>From:</p> <p><a class="reference external" href="http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf">http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf</a></p> <p>もしこれは今更Xen4.0の上にACPI 3.0完全的なサポートが得ない原因、ならBill Gatesを呪います！</p>