Farseerfcの巣 - import//farseerfc.me/jp/2011-03-14T20:34:00+09:00“…if we do this work … ” --Bill Gates2011-03-14T20:34:00+09:002011-03-14T20:34:00+09:00farseerfctag:farseerfc.me,2011-03-14:/jp/if-we-do-this-work.html<p><a class="reference external" href="http://blog.renren.com/blog/230263946/716517729">renren</a>
から導入した。</p>
<p>From: Bill Gates</p>
<p>’-- Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:41 AM</p>
<p>Jeff Westorinon; Ben Fathi ;</p>
<p>TO: Carl Stork (Exchange); Nathan Myhrvofd; Eric Rudder</p>
<p>Subject: ACPI extensions</p>
<p>One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and
make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific.</p>
<p>It …</p><p><a class="reference external" href="http://blog.renren.com/blog/230263946/716517729">renren</a>
から導入した。</p>
<p>From: Bill Gates</p>
<p>’-- Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:41 AM</p>
<p>Jeff Westorinon; Ben Fathi ;</p>
<p>TO: Carl Stork (Exchange); Nathan Myhrvofd; Eric Rudder</p>
<p>Subject: ACPI extensions</p>
<p>One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and
make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific.</p>
<p>It seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the
work and the result is that <strong>Linux works great without having to do the work</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Maybe there is no way to avoid this problem but it does bother me.</strong></p>
<p>Maybe we could define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not
the others even if they are open.</p>
<p>Or maybe we could patent something relaled to this.</p>
<p>From:</p>
<p><a class="reference external" href="http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf">http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf</a></p>
<p>もしこれは今更Xen4.0の上にACPI 3.0完全的なサポートが得ない原因、ならBill Gatesを呪います!</p>